EVALUATION NATO SEMINAR

Seminar as a whole

Excellent

Good

Average

Below average

Bad

How would you rate the organisation of the event? *

How would you rate the structure of the seminar? *

How well did you feel that the seminar addressed the main topic? *

How would you rate the cost of the seminar? *

How well did this seminar meet your expectations? *

How would you rate the seminar documentation? *

Content of the seminar

Excellent

Good

Average

Below average

Bad

How would you rate the variety of content? *

How would you rate the length of the sessions? *

How would you rate the depth of material? *

How would you rate the relevancy of content to your job? *

How would you rate access to staff (addressing your questions and hearing your comments) *

Presentation / Presenter

I agree completely

I somewhat agree

I have no opinion

I tend to disagree

I disagree completely

Clearly explained objective and scope of project *

Provided sufficient background information *

Established relationship with past work in field *

Addressed audience at appropriate level *

Demonstrated competence in subject matter *

Presentation was well organized with logical flow of ideas *

Made effective use of audio-visual aids *

Spoke clearly, audibly, and neither too fast nor too slow *

Established good rapport with audience (eye contact, posture) *

Avoided disturbing mannerisms *

Provided concise and thoughtful answers to questions *

Made subject matter interesting and held audience attention *

Presentation was of appropriate duration *

EVALUATION NATO SEMINAR

Seminar as a whole

Content of the seminar

Presentation / Presenter

Location

Meals during seminar

About yourself and your organisation

Personal gain from this seminar